# Muscle Freak Mask Dumbbell Puzzle | with Answer

### Muscle Freak Mask Dumbbell Puzzle

Math Puzzle with Answer. Check for the correct answer and its explanation below.

__ANSWER__**44 is the answer**

__Explanation__

Equation 1: 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 (So, Muscle Man = 5)

Equation 2: 3 + 3 + 3 = 9 (So Mask = 3)

Equation 3: 6 + 6 + 6 = 18 (So, Dumbbell = 6 ; Note that here the Dumbbell has 3 rings, so the value of 1 Ring = 2)

Equation 4: (4 + 4) + (5 + 3 + 4) x 3 (In this equation, the Dumbbell has only 2 rings, so the value of Dumbbell = 4 ; Also the Muscle Man is wearing a Mask & holding a Dumbbell)

=> 8 + (12 x 3)

=> 8 + 36

**=> 44**

that seems illogical.. Just look at the sizes of rings, hence the values couldn't be same.

ReplyDelete

ReplyDeleteattention to dumbbells ... The weights are not the same dimensions, so they will not have the same weight! Considering the weight "a" the lightest, "b" the intermediate and "c" the heaviest, we arrive at the following condition 2a <2b <2c where its sum will be 6. Therefore 2a = 1, 2b = 2, 2c = 3

1 + 2 + 3 = 6

In the dumbbells of the last row, the pairs "a" are not found, each one is worth (2b + 2c) 5

That said, the result will be:

5 + 5 + (5 + 5 + 3) x3 = 49

hug

Not only are the weights of different sizes and therefore are not deducible to any specific numerical value in this example, the bar holding the weights is completely ignored. The answer is wrong. The differing photos are a mistake. The final answer to the puzzle is 54.

DeleteExxxactly & Finally someone (else too ;-) ) is getting The correct answer of hah approximately 49 (that ^ bar-thing should maybe taken in consideration too 😄). 👍

DeleteRigh👍

Delete54 is the correct answer. As the dumble has three different diameter. The weight distribution of the dumble is to be assumed as follows

Delete0.5+1.0+1.5=3

Like that one bar with 6 pieces =6.

If u see the question the weight lifter holding the dumble weight is

(0+1.0+1.5) +(0+1.0+1.5) =5.0

Watch this youtube video for the correct answer of this puzzle.

ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/EUNeP6cb-G4

Wrong answer. First learn yhe rule of simplification

ReplyDeleteWhat is it?

DeleteIn my opinion. I would say Músico has the closest possible answer, discs are worth (.5),(1),(1.5). However the handle is not being counted. In order to work, the value of it would have to be zero. Something that is not logical either.

ReplyDeleteAlthough 49 seems what appears to be the right answer. It would be in my opinion an assumption. If the discs were in piles without the handle, I’d say it was irrevocably 49. BTW, the rule of simplification says to perform multiplication before addition if no parenthesis is found.

Ooooops! After going around in circles trying to how assign a logical value to the handle mathematically. Visiting forums and comparing responses. I realized the answer is 44. The value of the discs big or small is assigned. It is not created by an interpretation of a relationship to weight. If you want to assigned zero to the handle is perfectly possible and valid. The only real clue is that we have 6 discs and it’s value adds up to 6. So it is mathematically correct to assign a value of 1 per disc. The units of the puzzle are never mentioned, if they were lbs, kg, or other weight unit, we would be in trouble. I’d love to see the puzzle with an extra line with weights and another value to determine if we should after the right unit theory.

ReplyDeleteI have read all the comments and suggestions posted by the visitors for this article are very fine,We will wait for your next article so only.Thanks! nose bridge wire

ReplyDeleteGreat blog ! I am impressed with suggestions of author.

ReplyDeleteBuy Dumbbells

You delivered such an impressive piece to read, giving every subject enlightenment for us to gain information. Thanks for sharing such information with us due to which my several concepts have been cleared. dbal

ReplyDeleteWhat about bodybuilder holding the weight

ReplyDeleteWhen I have asked people which is more likely to be correct:

ReplyDelete+) Small, medium, and Large dumbbells all having the same 'score' or

+) The Small_Dumbells =1, Medium_Dumbbells =2, Large_Dumbbells =3 ...

Everyone (well 80 people) all think the latter is 'more' correct - and asked me to report back to the setter of this problem.

AJ

Muscle man=5

ReplyDeleteMask=3

Dum bell ring=2

With two sets of dumbbells with two rings being side by side, and a man wearing a mask and holding a 2 ringed dumbbell, consider this;

4(4)+5(3)(4)x3

Because you have a 2 ringed dumbbell so that equals 4. Without having a mathematical symbol between the two you should automatically multiply those two together. So 4(4)=16

Same process with the man wearing a mask; so 5(3), and holding a 2 ringed dumbbell, so 5(3)(4). 5(3)=15, 15(4)=60

Following the rules of PEMDAS you do the parenthesis first as shown prior. Then you do all possible multiplication. Since you equation is now 16+60x3= you should multiply 60 and 3, to get 180.

Now add 16 and 180. Your total is 196.

You’re welcome. :)

Bylle, thats what I came up with also.

ReplyDeleteIf you are worried about a quote for use on your offices afterward please get in contact. We should arrange any onsite visit in one of this trusted team to examine your a workplace and provide you with report detailing the services you can easlily offer, any subject we foresee check out page location, or specialized requirements that may wish to be revealed. We should discuss this report in hand, and come up with a tailor-made work cleaning contract in line with our ability. maid services dubai

ReplyDeleteThis is also a very good post which I really enjoyed reading. It is not every day that I have the possibility to see something like this.. Workout Info

ReplyDeleteGreat post. Post that have meaningful and insightful comments are more enjoyable, at least to me. Visit also

ReplyDeleteOlympic Barbell Online SingaporeThank you for sharing good knowledge and information about

ReplyDeleteGym Equipment Relocation Specialist In Orange City. It's very helpful and understanding. as we have been looking for this information for a long time.Very well post. It was an awesome post to read about

ReplyDeleteOnline Nutrition Consultant In Mumbai. Complete rich content and fully informative. I totally Loved it .Very well written article. It was an awesome article to read. Read more info about adjustable dumbbells singapore. Complete rich content and fully informative. I totally Loved it.

ReplyDeleteGreat job for publishing such a nice article. Your article isn’t only useful but it is additionally really informative. Read more info about Weight Training Sydney. Thank you because you have been willing to share information with us.

ReplyDelete